GRE写作Issue部分精品素材分享之科学论

北京GRE培训,GRE备考资料,GRE网课,GRE培训机构,GRE保分班,GRE真题,GRE课程

想要在GRE作文部分的考试中写出优秀的文章，论据素材是重要的一环。好的论据不仅能帮助你支撑观点，加强说服力，还能体现出考生在阅读量上的积累和深厚扎实的语言功底基础。特别是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作为储备，才能保证考生无论遭遇那种题目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的写作。小编为大家整理了GRE

ISSUE作文各类题目的精品优质素材，一起来看吧。

政府对抗技术负面影响的作用

Individuals rely on governmental assistance to control the side effects and

negative consequences of technology.

1. Supposed independence of government. An assumption commonly made about the

government is that their governance role is neutral or independent. However,

some argue that governing is a political process, so government will be

influenced by political winds of influence. In addition, because government

provides much of the funding for technological research and development, it has

a vested interest in certain outcomes. Others point out that the world’s biggest

ecological disasters, such as the Aral Sea, Chernobyl, and Lake Karachay have

been caused by government projects, which are not accountable to consumers, so

governments should stay out of industry entirely.

2. Liability. One means for controlling technology is to place responsibility

for the harm with the agent causing the harm. Government can allow more or less

legal liability to fall to the organizations or individuals responsible for damages.

科学的界定

Karl Popper contended that the central question in the philosophy of science

was distinguishing science from non-science. Early attempts by the logical

positivists grounded science in observation while non-science (e.g. metaphysics)

was non-observational and hence nonsense. Popper claimed that the central

feature of science was that science aims at falsifiable claims (i.e. claims that

can be proven false, at least in theory). No single unified account of the

difference between science and non-science has been widely accepted by

philosophers, and some regard the problem as unsolvable or uninteresting.

科学的哲学

Philosophy of science is the study of assumptions, foundations, and

implications of science. The field is defined by an interest in one of a set of

“traditional” problems or an interest in central or foundational concerns in

science. In addition to these central problems for science as a whole, many

philosophers of science consider these problems as they apply to particular

sciences (e.g. philosophy of biology or philosophy of physics). Some

philosophers of science also use contemporary results in science to draw

philosophical morals. Although most practitioners are philosophers, several

prominent scientists have (and do) contributed to the field.

Issues of ethics, such as bioethics and scientific misconduct, are not

generally considered part of philosophy of science. These issues may be studied

in ethics or science studies.

人们对科技对环境危害的严重性认识不足

However, as Carl Sagan points out in Pulling the Plug on Mother Earth,

awareness is not enough, nor is society’s response to the catastrophic

implications of environmental pollution rapid enough. Slowness to implement

sound strategies are in part due to the fact that the threats we face are

nebulous, since they come in the form of particles of invisible gases and

radioactivity, and in part because response to pollution appears to be so costly

at individual, governmental and corporate levels. It appears that great material

loss, as well as visual manifestation, has been the only ways to galvanize

action towards altering and limiting technologies so that adverse chemicals

and substances are no longer belched into the environment.